Monday, December 23, 2013

Time for a ‘Broom Revolution’ in India




At one of the most pity democratic circumstances of Kerala, Jayalaxmi was the only woman able and available to represent 18 million women of Kerala in the state ministry. By any chance, if the constitution of India directs that, logically every state should have a women chief minister for half of its term…We will think about that when that time comes. But it is the time to think about India, it has either a Hindu fanatic who has perpetrated to kill thousands of innocent Muslims; or the great grandson of Nehru, who has proved himself as a flop leader, to become the Prime Minister.

Congress, a party that was formed over a century ago for certain other purposes at a very different social context has lost its ideological existence in more than one reason. Moreover, the mass response in the assembly polls reveal that the huge welfare programmes and policies of the centre could not cover the big blot of corruption the party is carrying. Its leader Rahul Gandhi, who has always shown immaturity in his outbursts, can never be imagined as the Prime Minister of India. It is awful to imagine him rolling his sleeves up in an international forum to make his points heard.

He is no more a naive politician, but he is not an efficient leader, as he has proved in his performance in the parliament and in his leadership in the party as well. Wherever he went to speak, people not only deserted the meeting but also failed the party candidate. Despite his bad reputation of leading the party to failure after failure, he is not only hanging on the top position of the congress party but also going to be the prime ministerial candidate of the party or UPA only because of his lineage in the dynasty.  As a late consciousness, if congress party is going to field Rahul as the Prime Ministerial candidate, not only the people of India are not going to accept him but even the congress workers are also not going to accept him. Let him restrict congress to win two digits in the parliament Loksabha election!

But is Modi the alternative? To rule the largest democracy in the world, is there no one other than a tainted man of a pogrom that killed over a thousand innocent Muslims; who is known as the merchant of death? By racing a unity run, can the sins of a holocaust or the shame of a genocide meted on our great nation be undone? Anyone who is proud to be an Indian and proud to live in the country of Gandhi should feel regret to see a Hindu fundamentalist autocrat like him becoming the prime minister of India.

Religious extremism and materialistic growth are the two hallmarks of Modi. For sure, in the hands of Modi, who has not given a single seat to any non-Hindus in Gujrat, the secular fabric of India is going to be shattered into pieces. The much propagated Gujarat model of development, that is contract, construct and campaign will only increase the gap between the haves and have-nots. It was Chandra Babu Naidu who experimented this kind of cosmetic development approach earlier; his rule was propagated inside and outside the state, and he made sure that his glory is covered by other countries’ media as well. But even before the end of his rule, thousands of farmers committed suicide. It   took years to revamp the dilapidated rural economy of Andhra and Naidu became the least preferred leader of AP today.

Modi’s campaign of Gujarat model can only be compared to Vajpayee government’s shining India campaign. Gujrat has a long history of trade relations, industrial growth, natural resources and all kinds of economic prosperity, yet it is one of the least performing states in terms of human development index, literacy, universal education, health care, infant mortality rate and many other indicators of social development.  Although Kerala was one of the poorest states of India in  the early years of Independence, it invested in people and in social development, thus Kerala has now become the most developed state in India according to the 2013 Raghuram Rajan committee report, whereas Gujrat did not show up within the top 10 states. While knowing that Gujarat is one of the least performing states in the ‘Aadhar’ drive, we can understand that how far administration goes to the masses beyond the smoke screen of tar and concrete. Then, to bluff whom is this bandwagon?

Indeed, India doesn't have a single politician with the guts to fairly collect the tax and spent for the decent living of its citizens. Industrialist lobbies and middlemen are actively gearing for Modi’s advent, for the celebration of the private sector as the Ambani brothers are already enjoying in Gujrat now. Well, with the ‘nano’ saga even Tata is a Modi fan; all the capitalists foresee a fertile soil in Modi’s land!

No one is sceptical about BJPs ability to do corruption as their notorious leaders have proved wherever they came to power. It is only an ongoing argument in the country that which party is more corrupt. But we all know that they are together for corruption. Modi’s nation-wide advertisement for unity run and ambition to erect 150 feet tall Patel statue show that he lives in an utopian India, not in a country of the largest number of extreme poor in the world.

Here arises the question; are we ready for a ‘broom revolution’? The ripples of jasmine revolution of course came to India; millions took to the streets.  It was not just a protest against crime against women but resentment to the anarchy and corruption that people are fed up with. AAP, that raised a few slogans and messages that everyone wanted to say, dashed to power without any politicians in it, within months after its formation. That means, despite political allegiance people of India are desperately looking for someone who can clean up Indian political scene.

The resonant of Jasmine revolution heard in India in the form of a mass movement for Lokpal bill, a very democratic form of demand for a corrupt free India. Anna Hazare’s popularity as a reformist and Gandhian added impetus to this movement. But it was Aravind Kejriwal who made it as a massive movement due to his skills as a great coordinator and die-hard fighter against corruption. When Aravind went a step ahead with forming a political party Anna Hazare parted away. Ideological differences of Hazare as a moderate can be understood, but had that movement not become a political party, that wouldn't be a making a serious impact in the fight against corruption.  Anna Hazare team has not yet realized that politics is the logical culmination for every movement.

Now Aravind Kejriwal has proved that he was right in his decision, it is the time all others including Anna Hazare to join hand together with them if we are against corruption. A disenchanted electorate is clearly behind the sounding mandate to AAP which made an ambitious lap from the anti-corruption (Lokpal) movement. We need to realise that they are an instrument for us to realise our aspirations to restore power to the people. Beyond congress Parivar, sangh Parivar and the local selfish Parivars we need a group of learned and committed people not to lead themselves but to lead us; lead our nation.

In the wake of the nation heading into the hands of either to a dreaded criminal fanatic or to an inept inexperienced dynasty successor, Yogendra Yadav a well-known psephologist, social scientist and former university lecturer and a leader of AAP said “an election between Modi versus Rahul Gandhi will be a tragedy for the country”. If you and I agree with this, it can be the right time to mobilise a political alternative. As Aravind Kejriwal once said, history will never forgive us unless we utilise this opportunity to cleanse the corrupt Indian political system.  

Michael Manjalloor
michaelmanjalloor@gmil.com

Thursday, January 20, 2011

EXPLOITATION OF THE RICH LEADS TO UNREST

ONE FIFTH of the world's people live on a dollar a day. More than a third are illiterate, and more than a hundred million have no access to basic health care, sanitation, or education. 20% rich people live with 80% of the world's wealth. It is sure the rich are becoming richer only with exploitation. It is time to think of equitable distribution of wealth and resources.
Amassing wealth beyond what they can use is a syndrom for some one. And make money letting others deprived is others' fun. For someone, exploitation for the accumulation of wealth is an inherited hobby.

It is the time that society as a whole need to examine the flow of money and resources in to the hands of a few "influential". Governments and burocrats are the instruments in their hands. So, common man is struggling to survive. Democratic governments are scared to check the flow of wealth and resources in to the hands of the undeserved. Until natural resources and wealth are equitably distributed, social distress will keep on growing.

The rich are still not able to understand that they are the main cause of the present social unrest. Finally the wealthy eats a lot and succumb to death. And the poor starve to death. Let us try to redefine the use of money and resources.

What we wanted is Health body, educated minds and happy life..